Showing posts with label copa america. Show all posts
Showing posts with label copa america. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Bielsa and Athletic Bilbao

Marcelo Bielsa's arrival at Athletic Bilbao has the potential to remake La Liga. His team may not win right away, or at least they might not be ready to take on the two historic top flight teams (Barcelona and Real Madrid) but his presence will mean the opening of a third position in the ideological and practical battle that Jose Mourinho and Josep (Pep) Guardiola have been waging, both in the open through their sometimes quite hostile back and forth, and more consistently in the tactical staging of their many confrontations on the field in last season's tournaments.

Now, it is clear that this is football and coaches (and their projects) can get canned in a minute but assuming he is given room and time to develop his vision for Athletic Bilbao, the opportunities to craft a third option will likely develop. Although he just took over at Athletic there are already is a small sampling of what is to come. In a press conference last week Bielsa refreshed his key concepts for the Spanish press: his teams seek "to become protagonists rather than to speculate, to establish presence in the opponent's half and not in our own, to value ball possession before ball recovery, and to promote the use of the rule book as a recourse to improve the game rather than a separate way to gain advantage." (The translation is loose but it carries the meaning of the original phrases). These precepts would seem to place him squarely in Guardiola's corner and against Mourinhos willingness to sacrifice aesthetics (and history and pretty much anything else) for the sake of winning. Yet Bielsa's teams have never played like Guardiola's, not even in 2004 when, between Argentina's Olympic gold in Athens and the teams superb performance in that year's Copa America (played in Peru), the team played its best football (despite the defeat in the Copa America final).

Despite the apparent similarities (at least rhetorically), Bielsa's posture and approach is different from Guardiola's. If not in intent--both are clearly offensive minded--they differ in the possibilities that their styles offer. The more direct, vertical, and downhill play favored by Bielsa differs from Barcelona's flowing style on an obvious aesthetic level. Leaving aside the presence of Barcelona's three greats--Iniesta, Xavi, and Messi--Bielsa's teams are much more structured and rigorous in their forging of clear positions within which players play a definitive role (and when they don't, or don't do so at a high enough level, they are substituted for another who attempts to play that same role). Because his style is much more schematic and programmatic, Bielsa could potentially transport his approach to other teams, large or small, powerful or weak--that's what observers typically praised in his Chilean side, the willingness to take a relatively weak and small Chilean national team and play them in a big offensive manner. Whether Guardiola's approach can travel remains to be seen but on game days when one of the big three is not on the field, one gets the sense that it would be much harder to carry it elsewhere.

This is not a minor point and it represents a potential important interruption in the decades long binary battle between Barcelona and Real Madrid that characterizes La Liga. Bielsa's arrival offers the possibility of openning a third position which, if successful, might offer a potential point of departure that would give the smaller, weaker Spanish teams another option beyond massively defensive schemes that merely seek to speculate.

Sunday, July 17, 2011

why the women's world cup is a better game

this year's women's world cup in germany has made clear everything that has been cut out, forcibly removed, and exorcised by the forces of evil from the men's game:

1) offensive play: women's football is more tactically honest and faithful to the organizing principles of the game. the tactical disposition of women's world cup games are almost completely devoid of the sort of perverse speculation that utterly dominates the men's game and pretty much all the teams--even the less talented teams--play an associative style

2) strength: the scale of the field in relation to the physical strength of the players means that there are much more opportunities for playing into space, something which has--on the back of stingy and unethical coaching and the priveligening of musculature and marathoning skills--all but disappeared from the men's game. in the men's game, physicality and physical play typically carry such a premium that teams more often than not aim and strategize to play through the body of the opposition rather than into the space behind him or to his side.

3) teamwork and stars: standout players in the women's world cup are the sort of players that used to dominate the men's game prior to the era of multimedia and hyperglobalized television. marta, christiane, sonia bompastor, aya miyama, kelly smith, and homare sawa are all central figures on their teams not only for their own finishing and goal scoring prowess but also for their ability to set up teammates with precise passing.

overly defensive strategies crafted by would-be tactic wizards and hyper glamourized superstar strikers (with superstar egos) have been slowly but surely strangling (men's) football's creativity and appeal for decades. this year's Copa America quarterfinals are telling: stingy defensive and speculative teams displaced more offensive counterparts in every bracket leaving the weakest field in terms of on the ball talent in years. rather than emulating barcelona's (and spain's) example and favoring offensive football and privileging of talent over physical prowess, the world of (male) football has taken the lesson that more muscle, more senseless and endless running, and more air tight defensive strategies. maybe if they watched a bit of the women's world cup...